Test results in Suffolk County
| Result | Share | EPA guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Below 2 pCi/L | 69% | Below EPA's levels |
| 2 to 4 pCi/L | 21% | Consider fixing |
| 4 pCi/L or more | 10% | EPA recommends fixing |
What the data shows
- Higher share of high results than 1 of 14 Massachusetts counties.
- Below the Massachusetts rate of 24%.
- Lowest of 4 neighbouring counties.
- 31% of results at or above 2 pCi/L.
- EPA's 1993 map: Zone 3, an average below 2 pCi/L. Measured average: 2.0 pCi/L.
- 23.9 tests per 1,000 homes (Massachusetts: 77.3).
- Median result 1.3 pCi/L: below 2 pCi/L.
How Suffolk County compares
Data table
| Area | Tests ≥ 4 pCi/L | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| Essex County | 29% | 20,398 |
| Middlesex County | 22% | 75,220 |
| Norfolk County | 21% | 39,205 |
| Plymouth County | 17% | 16,320 |
| Suffolk County | 10% | 8,525 |
| Massachusetts (14 counties) | 24% | 234,152 |
Same source as Suffolk County.
What it means for your home
About 1 in 10 results in Suffolk County were at or above 4 pCi/L, where the EPA recommends a fix. Only a test shows your own home's level.
Levels in pCi/L from the EPA. The WHO reference level is 100 Bq/m³, about 2.7 pCi/L.
Test your home
Start with a short-term test (2–90 days) and confirm a result of 4 pCi/L or more with a second test. EPA guide
Sponsored: we earn a commission on purchases through these links. We haven't tested Airthings monitors yet.
Prefer a digital monitor? See Airthings radon monitors, or enter code radonbycounty-10OFF at their discount store for 10% off.
Fixing high radon
No local job records yet. National range: $800–$2,500, average $1,200 (EPA, 2003). Cost guide →
About this data
Source: Radon test results from laboratories (CDC Environmental Public Health Tracking Network). Period: 2008–2017. Tests: 8,525. Read the methodology →
These are voluntary and real-estate tests, not a random sample of homes, so they describe tested homes rather than every home.
About this page
Published by Ray Roman, editor of Radon by County. Figures are loaded from the cited source and spot-checked against it. Editorial policy · About us