Test results in Macon County
| Result | Share | EPA guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Below 2 pCi/L | 51% | Below EPA's levels |
| 2 to 4 pCi/L | 30% | Consider fixing |
| 4 pCi/L or more | 19% | EPA recommends fixing |
What the data shows
- Higher share of high results than 29 of 95 Tennessee counties.
- Below the Tennessee rate of 33%.
- Lowest of 7 neighbouring counties.
- 49% of results at or above 2 pCi/L.
- 6.1 tests per 1,000 homes (Tennessee: 9.9).
- Median result 1.9 pCi/L: below 2 pCi/L.
How Macon County compares
Data table
| Area | Tests ≥ 4 pCi/L | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| Monroe County, Kentucky | 53% | 87 |
| Jackson County | 47% | 49 |
| Smith County | 45% | 55 |
| Clay County | 35% | 46 |
| Allen County, Kentucky | 29% | 58 |
| Trousdale County | 27% | 33 |
| Sumner County | 26% | 1,311 |
| Macon County | 19% | 67 |
| Tennessee (95 counties) | 33% | 31,066 |
Same source as Macon County.
What it means for your home
About 1 in 5 results in Macon County were at or above 4 pCi/L, where the EPA recommends a fix. Only a test shows your own home's level.
Levels in pCi/L from the EPA. The WHO reference level is 100 Bq/m³, about 2.7 pCi/L.
Test your home
Start with a short-term test (2–90 days) and confirm a result of 4 pCi/L or more with a second test. EPA guide
Sponsored: we earn a commission on purchases through these links. We haven't tested Airthings monitors yet.
Prefer a digital monitor? See Airthings radon monitors, or enter code radonbycounty-10OFF at their discount store for 10% off.
Fixing high radon
No local job records yet. National range: $800–$2,500, average $1,200 (EPA, 2003). Cost guide →
About this data
Source: Radon test results from laboratories (CDC Environmental Public Health Tracking Network). Period: 2008–2017. Tests: 67. Read the methodology →
These are voluntary and real-estate tests, not a random sample of homes, so they describe tested homes rather than every home.
About this page
Published by Ray Roman, editor of Radon by County. Figures are loaded from the cited source and spot-checked against it. Editorial policy · About us