53%properties ≥ 4 pCi/L
19properties tested annually (avg.)
3.9median pCi/L
Zone 1EPA zone (1993 prediction)

Highest result per tested property in Swift County

ResultShareEPA guidance
Below 2 pCi/L20%Below EPA's levels
2 to 4 pCi/L27%Consider fixing
4 pCi/L or more53%EPA recommends fixing

What the data shows

Where Swift County sits among Minnesota's 87 counties with dataEach dot is a county's share of tests at or above 4 pCi/L · Minnesota county radon testing indicators, 2016–2025
0%20%40%60%80%

How Swift County compares

Swift County ranks 6 of 7 among its neighboursShare of properties at or above 4 pCi/L · Minnesota county radon testing indicators, 2016–2025
Chippewa County69%Lac qui Parle County68%Kandiyohi County64%Stevens County61%Big Stone County60%Swift County53%Pope County52%
Data table

Same source as Swift County.

What it means for your home

More than half of all results in Swift County were at or above 4 pCi/L, where the EPA recommends a fix. Only a test shows your own home's level.

Levels in pCi/L from the EPA. The WHO reference level is 100 Bq/m³, about 2.7 pCi/L.

Test your home

Start with a short-term test (2–90 days) and confirm a result of 4 pCi/L or more with a second test. EPA guide

Sponsored: we earn a commission on purchases through these links. We haven't tested Airthings monitors yet.

Prefer a digital monitor? See Airthings radon monitors, or enter code radonbycounty-10OFF at their discount store for 10% off.

Fixing high radon

No local job records yet. National range: $800–$2,500, average $1,200 (EPA, 2003). Cost guide →

Minnesota licenses radon mitigators. Source

Buying or selling here

Minnesota's Radon Awareness Act requires sellers to disclose in writing any known radon tests, results and mitigation, and to give buyers the Department of Health publication "Radon in Real Estate Transactions" (Minn. Stat. § 144.496). Source

Checked against the official text on 2026-11-03. Not legal advice.

About this data

Source: Minnesota county radon testing indicators (Minnesota Department of Health). Period: 2016–2025. Published indicators: 101 properties at or above 4 pCi/L, 152 at or above 2 pCi/L, and 19 properties tested annually on average. Read the methodology →

These are voluntary and real-estate tests, not a random sample of homes, so they describe tested homes rather than every home.

About this page

Published by Ray Roman, editor of Radon by County. Figures are loaded from the cited source and spot-checked against it. Editorial policy · About us