Test results in Cass County
| Result | Share | EPA guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Below 2 pCi/L | 21% | Below EPA's levels |
| 2 to 4 pCi/L | 22% | Consider fixing |
| 4 pCi/L or more | 58% | EPA recommends fixing |
What the data shows
- Higher share of high results than 18 of 53 North Dakota counties.
- Higher than 3 of 5 neighbouring counties.
- 79% of results at or above 2 pCi/L.
- 9.7 tests per 1,000 homes (North Dakota: 17.5).
- Median result 4.7 pCi/L: at or above the 4 pCi/L action level.
How Cass County compares
Data table
| Area | Tests ≥ 4 pCi/L | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| Barnes County | 67% | 83 |
| Ransom County | 62% | 151 |
| Cass County | 58% | 862 |
| Traill County | 51% | 37 |
| Richland County | 43% | 93 |
| Steele County | 0% | 1 |
| North Dakota (53 counties) | 59% | 6,607 |
Same source as Cass County. Other bordering counties: Clay County, Minnesota, Norman County, Minnesota.
What it means for your home
More than half of all results in Cass County were at or above 4 pCi/L, where the EPA recommends a fix. Only a test shows your own home's level.
Levels in pCi/L from the EPA. The WHO reference level is 100 Bq/m³, about 2.7 pCi/L.
Test your home
Start with a short-term test (2–90 days) and confirm a result of 4 pCi/L or more with a second test. EPA guide
Sponsored: we earn a commission on purchases through these links. We haven't tested Airthings monitors yet.
Compare radon test kits and Airthings monitors, or enter code radonbycounty-10OFF at their
discount store for 10% off.
Fixing high radon
No local job records yet. National range: $800–$2,500, average $1,200 (EPA, 2003). Cost guide →
About this data
Source: Radon test results from laboratories (CDC Environmental Public Health Tracking Network). Period: 2008–2017. Tests: 862. Read the methodology →
These are voluntary and real-estate tests, not a random sample of homes, so they describe tested homes rather than every home.
About this page
Published by Ray Roman, editor of Radon by County. Figures are loaded from the cited source and spot-checked against it. Editorial policy · About us